Into a butterfly a cocoon emerges

Sunday, September 10, 2006

Us Open final: Roger vs Roddick

I'm already envisioning what the match will be like-Pandy all brute and force with Connors, his newfound coach edging him on from the player's box, the crowd all wild and frenzied cheering the all American Roddick and his not too pleasant antics on court while ROger, on the other side of the net, is just content to let his racket or more like magic wand do the fighting and talking. I don't care what the media says about Roddick's all improved game, to me, it remains as dull as a school's textbook. His game as i see it is the antithesis to Roger's stylish tennis-all Lacroix in its genius , imagination and inventiveness. I don't want to gloat lest I jinx Roger or something but I want the intelligent and the beautiful to triumph in the person of Roger. So, I'll stop my Roddick bashing for now and i'll just continue with more jabbings and stone throwings after ROger wins. Goodluck Rog!

Thursday, August 31, 2006

What will be the plot of this year's US Open?

Here's how i see it: Andre Agassi will be losing in the early rounds. I know this is his farewell tournament and much that he wants to add one final GS to his already 8 I don't think he can make it beyond the quarters. He said in his post match interview that miracles can happen and he has not stopped believing. Well, good for him for showing great faith but miracles and its powers tend to shrink in collision with Fate. Fate, this year and will remain so for a couple more, favors ROger Federer and his quest to be the GReatest Tennis Player of ALL TIME. Sorry Andre.

David Sedaris' Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denims

There has been a lot of buzz around David Sedaris' books so i got all curious and decided to buy one and see for myself what the hype is all about. Most critics say Sedaris is one witty writer and after reading a few pages from his Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Pants i have to agree. The comic tone is effortless and so fluid that I giggle the way through the first few pages uncontrollably. I'm liking the book so far.

Thursday, August 17, 2006

What! Roger Lost To Andy Murray!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes he did. I'm afraid so. It was a shock to say the least because Roger losing (to anyone other than Rafa) is like the sun rising in the west. It just can't happen. Unthinkable. But it did today and to Andy Murray at that. I knew this was coming when he seemed too unRoger-like in his match against Paradorn in the 1st round. His UE were coming fast and furious and most were coming from his usually reliable forehand. I hate it when this guy loses. I feel like the order of the universe has been rattled and the laws of the cosmos being turned upside down. His lost gives me a rather weird feeling. It was painful to see Roger playing badly. I'm missing his sublime, 'Wimby' tennis. Where are those scintillating shots? Those mesmerizing backhands and forehands? I want Rog no other way. I want him back to his usual self come US Open. He must get his 9th GS at Flushing meadows.

Roger must take pity on me and many of his devout fans. We are in pain everytime he falls. Seriously.

'cmmon Rog, let us take the US Open-in killer Rogi, fashion. Goodluck to you baby!

Brad Gilbert was looking smug the whole time during Rog match. BG, by the way, is Andy Murray's coach.

Saturday, July 01, 2006

Rules be damned!

Our Lady of Fatima University makes the silliest of all rules. Just this week they implemented a "No artificial hair color policy" for the nursing students. I mean how ridiculous can they get. I don't see the point. I know nurses are supposed to look clean, plain, chaste, virginal but 'cmmon does having a dyed hair make one unclean and less befitting to be a nurse? We're going to be future nurses not nuns for chrissakes. What is bothering me even more is the whole fuss they're making out of this one. My God, they're actually taking their no-brainer policy seriously!!! It's one thing to create benign,stupid rules, it's another to be deluded into thinking they are the world's greatest. I feel like slapping myself for following, submitting to this policy. If they think this is some way to instill discipline among students, would it hurt so much if they let us acquire discipline in a manner that is dignified and rational? This is getting hilarious and terrifying by the minute. What will they come up with next time? I'm afraid to even think about it.

Wimbledon update

Roger Federer is through to the 4th round beating Nicolas Mahut in straight sets.On Monday he will face Tomas Berdych whom Roger beat in the Halle final. I don't want to jinx Roger but i really believe he'll manage to pass the 4th round test without so much of a bleep. with the way that he's been playing it's difficult to imagine someone beating Rog in the hallowed grounds of his beloved Wimby.

I'm so relieved that this tourny has finally arrived after the disappointment of the French Open. There's something about Wimbledon that makes it extra special and unique. Most of the players credit it to its aura/atmosphere and antiquity. I agree. but my reason for liking Wimby is more personal. I make no attempt to hide the fact that I adore Rog so to see him so comfortable and so 'at home' in Wimby is enough to make me love Wimby. Roger and Wimbledon-they're perfect together.

Andre Agassi will soon retire. He made the announcement that this year's Wimbledon will be his last. I really hope that he makes it to the finals. Maybe it's too much to ask from an ailing/aging Agassi but who knows he might get all the inspiration from his desire to make his last his best. He'll play Nadal tonight-it's a tough one for Andre but the crowd will be behind him all the way so this might give him the extra push he needs.

Nalbandian and Blake are out. Shocking. The dynamics of tennis is so interesting-momentum shifts, mental breakdowns/meltdowns from players. I don't know what happened to Blake out there but in the last and deciding set, Max Mirnyi just had him by the neck. How disappointing it must be for Blake! Too bad he's such a nice guy and a looker to boot.

Need to go now. The Nadal-Agassi match is on.

Saturday, June 10, 2006

French Open and Roger

The finals is going to be on Sunday and Roger is again going to meet the muscled Malorcan, Rafael Nadal. Will fate be on Roger's side this time? Will the blessings of the tennis gods be upon him? Will history grant him a place in its book? All these will have their answers on Sunday.

As a fan I can never think of a much better proposition than Roger winning the title on Sunday. If that happens I don't know what I'm going to do-I'll probably flood the house with my tears and bring it down with my jubilation. This match, you see, is a huge, huge one and not just because it's the grand slam finals but because of the high stakes for ROg- a.) 'Roger Slam' (4 consecutive grand slam wins) b.) winning streaks in grand slam finals c.) complete tennis domination (by conquering clay, his 'least' favorite surface via the French Open).

If Roger is able to consolidate all his weapons tomorrow against Nadal, then without a doubt he'll claim The victory of his career. He needs to put all his past losses to Nadal behind. He must rise to the occasion, be ruthless, unforgiving, ready to buther and kill. I can't stand him losing to the likes of Rafael Nadal,not anymore. I'm getting tired. Roger is obviously the more talented artist between the two so it pains me to see him succumb to the brute power of Nadal. The artist, the more gifted should win. Nadal's game is hideously ugly, made uglier with his grunting and needless outburst of energy every minute of the entire match. This young kid needs to calm down-seriously! This kind of behavior on court is offensive to the opponent. I don't blame Ivan if he seems to bear contained animosity against Rafael. Ivan after his loss to Rafael Nadal in the semis made some remarks about Nadal's delaying tactic in between points. I've been noticing this behavior of Nadal for quite sometime now so Ivan's gripes are legit. maybe rafael is being coached by his Uncle Toni to do that. Who knows? one thing i KNow is that I don't like him. Everything about Rafael Nadal is exaggeration and I hate it.

Go roger!!! Make this young Spaniard pay for all the past three losses. Make him taste the bitter pang of defeat. Go, go, go Roger! Allez!!!!!

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Roger taking the French Open 2006 title

I'm betting that Roger will win this year's French Open. He has to. He must. Why? well, there are a thousand reasons really but the one that stands out most in my mind as a fan is he'll start weakening Rafael nadal's strangehold on him. The clay is Nadal's turf so if Roger beats him on his favorite surface Rog will totally own him and thus complete his domination. God, Lord Roger must win this one. PLease!!! Hahaha!!I'm a crazed fan. There's no cure for this one. But seriously, even if Roger maintains his No.1 spot at the end of every year if he keeps losing to that 19 yr. old Schwarzenegger of Spain how can he feel total satisfaction. All out, utter, complete, over the top domination is what Roger should aim for-nothing less than this is acceptable. Roger should stop with all politeness, I'm getting tired of it. He must growl like a leopard, make them (the rest of tennis field)fear him. fear, is the dominant factor in total domination. There can be no domination without fear. Kindness won't work. So Rogi, go go for tennis domination!!!! Nadal, must be taken cared of as soon as possible. Talent wise you are so way better. So please do something. Is this a deal my dear Rogi?

Paradox of Writing

I love the mighty pen. I love the words it struggles to bring to life, the beautiful composition it creates. Since a kid, writing has always appealed to me. I have dreamt of becoming the next Toni Morrison, the next Jane Austen or even the next Alice Walker. Writing is in my blood. I could feel it; I could taste it. There's never a moment, a day that passes that I don't get the urge to write whether I'm in class, at home or doing the most mundane of activities like cleaning plates, washing clothes and dusting furniture. Everywhere in me itches to speak, to cry, to laugh in print-my hand instinctively snatches the closest piece of paper; my body almost involuntarily heads to the nearest computer keyboard eager to punch away. In writing, I have found an ally, a lover and a friend.

Yet, despite my avowed devotion to it, I find myself tangled in its web of paradox. I’m not sure if other writers experience it. May be it’s just me and my, tormented, schizophrenic, conflicted approach to writing. I know not. But one thing I am certain of is that writing for me is a magnet that at once repels and attracts. There is no hint of a doubt that I am drawn to it like a moth is to the light but beneath there lies the trepidation, the hesitation that only true love inspires. This is the paradox of writing. It summons to create only to paralyze those who come arduously, amorously at its door.

Writing guarantees no easy passage. Anyone wanting to take part in it has to suffer and fight through the paradox. There is no other way. It draws blood and love at the same time; in its embrace lingers both tension and release. Writing, I’ve come to realize and come to terms with, is all a sheet of mended paradox from beginning till end. If one wants to escape it, to survive, one has to fully submit to it -absorbing the pains of a blank paper; the scanty, bumpy flow of words; the fears of mediocrity and indignity and; the joys of producing, of finding oneness in writing, and of stringing ideas into a single perfect whole.

This is the reality of writing-at least to me. It may not be a tour in the countryside or a walk in the park but it is and will always be the most gratifying of all experiences simply because it is what it is. In writing, I am myself. In it, I find no need to be someone else or to be burdened by anything except my connection to the text and audience-nothing more. Though it is a landscape of paradoxes, it is the most honest and forgiving-no pretensions, no sins unpardoned. Writing creates a climate that just suits me and my temperament. So no matter how I struggle in its paradox, I raise no complaint. How can I when it has taken me as its own, kept me diligently in its silence and tumultuous splendor?

Writing and life are two inseparable values in an equation. Without one, the other is useless. Life is intended to be written down, to be expressed, to be interpreted, to be shaped, to be given order and to be understood. Writing does all these to life and life submits like a pliant bamboo. There is paradox in writing because its subject and context-life-is one that thrives in contradictions. A mimic and mirror of life, writing, is left with no option but to behave in a full spectrum of paradoxes bringing into the act the faithful writer.

Although life in general feeds the paradox in writing, the mother, the source of its paradox is the love, the passion that drives one to write. It is both the culprit and the inspiration. I have learned that to worship writing, to be crazy about it is to struggle and to suffer. This is the ultimate paradox of writing. A writer fumbles, retreats, pauses at the outset, midway and even near the end of the writing process all for the love, the desire to piece together a wonderful creation. He refuses to offer in the altar of writing a work that is below par and doesn’t meet, pass his lofty expectations and standards.

There is no remedying this paradox, one simply guards against being overwhelmed and eaten alive by it.

To be a writer, I know I need to take courage not in dodging worries, fears and doubts that come along with the paradoxes but in confronting them. A heart of a lion is what writing demands and wants me to have. And this I will possess. In time.

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Humor Me:jessica Zafra's Conspiracy of Buns

Let’s all laugh-that’s the invitation of Jessica Zafra’s Conspiracy of Buns. There are lots to giggle about in her essay: guys being likened to parking spaces, her hilariously absurd theories of gay population explosion, her friend’s ‘very out there’ conspiracy of buns. There’s no escaping the humor in her essay. Every line screams it, forcing the reader to notice and join in the communion of the funny, intelligent and raw. This is the power, the beauty behind Jessica Zafra’s Conspiraccy of Buns. By creating, maintaining the tone of humor in her essay, she is able to draw an intimate link between audience and text. The readers aren’t left scratching their heads after finishing the essay or worse yawning away in utter boredom. We can always find some connection in every passage and thought.

Jessica Zafra’s humor in the essay is not forced; it doesn’t come out as ‘trying hard’. She effortlessly hurls words, phrases, sentences that disarm readers and send them to massive fits of laughter. Her essay is naturally funny. It is no stand-up comedy where the comedienne stands up on stage and delivers rehearsed lines and jokes. In the essay, the humor flows freely, spontaneously almost like a conversation. “Occasionally you meet an apparent perfect specimen. He’s smart, funny, attractive, sensitive, articulate, cultured, dresses well. He even cooks. The first question that pop into your head is not, ‘Is he seeing anyone?’ The first question is ‘Is he gay?’ And if the answer to both questions is no, What is wrong with him?” We can envision ourselves saying these lines to a friend over coffee. Such is the relaxed nature of humor in Zafra’s essay. It embraces more than it alienates.

Although the essay is pointedly light, it doesn’t ignore or trivialize. There may be humor in the essay, an attempt to take the load off of the topic (i.e. gay population explosion) and yet there hovers a sense of importance in all of it. The arguments, thoughts (although said in jest) are very intelligent and witty. Jessica Zafra in this essay explores the different possibilities, probabilities behind the gay explosion phenomenon and how the increasing number of gay guys can decrease the chances of heterosexual females from finding a significant other (SO). Her take on the topic may appear ridiculous but so is the strange meteoric rise in the number of homosexuals today. The absurd inspires the absurd. The weird meets the strange. Just vintage, vintage Jessica Zafra!

The brevity adds coherence to the essay. A reader doesn’t get lost in it for the material is handled well. There are no excesses, waste and pompousness. Conspiracy of Buns is simplicity at its finest (and funniest).

Its crispness is its cutting edge.

In any essay there must always be clear purpose, that one reason which sparks an essay’s creation. In Conspiracy of Buns it is obvious that its aim merely is to tell and by telling hopes to provoke smart, edgy thoughts in its readers. By introducing the topic (i.e, homosexuality) and mentioning possible explanations for its propagation, Jessica Zafra has succeeded in igniting interest. After reading the essay, a reader gets the sudden urge to form his/her own theory on gay population explosion no matter how wacky and so out of this world it is. In Zafra’s essay there’s no room for neutrality, lukewarm response and apathy. It forbids them. Such exquisite control of readers’ reactions comes from her ability to carry out the intention of her text. Jessica Zafra has perfected the ways of achieving her essay’s purpose: make readers laugh, keep them charmed even after the essay has been read through sheer inventiveness, originality and ironic appeal. As readers, the instance we take part in her essay there’s no other choice but to enjoy and be all ‘in the moment’.

In the final passage Jessica Zafra leaves a hanging thought: He raised an eyebrow. I raised an eyebrow. I had the sudden urge to watch Spartacus. This is an effective tool in keeping the audience on their toes till the very end. A reader must be asking herself what Jessica Zafra means by having a sudden urge to watch the epic film Spartacus. What is its connection to the essay? Jessica Zafra simply wants to draw a contrast between the gayness of homosexuals and hard masculinity of Spartacus. And to be noted also is the preceding dialogue between her and her friend prompting Jessica to make that final statement. Her friend accused her of being a haggot (i.e., fag hag) so naturally to shake off the weight of realization, the ‘oo nga no!’ after-feel, Jessica turns to all-manly Spartacus.

A Closer Look: Conrado de Quiros’ Brown Skin, White Masks

Conrado de Quiros is known for his biting criticisms of society and its forces. He is popular for his impassioned notes about the Philippines’ socio-political landscape-Arroyo’s leadership pitfalls, present politicos’ brazen corruption, snarls of poverty and the seemingly endless, pointless social inequality punctuating Filipinos’ everyday life. It is therefore not a surprise for me to read an essay that has a touch of his signature fiery, intelligent, thoughtful, persuasive commentaries. In Brown Skin, White Masks, Conrado de Quiros talks about the perpetuation of racial prejudice within the context and bounds of our culture. He introduces this subject in the opening paragraph where he mentions a critical letter from TABAK (Tunay na Alyansa ng Bayan Alay sa Katutubo) condemning the racist remark of Vina Morales, the actress cum singer, in one of the episodes of Mel and Jay (the weekly TV program). Although the main statement of his essay is absent in the initial paragraph, we, the readers are given a sneak preview of the textual theme.

In the succeeding paragraphs, Conrado de Quiros works on developing his topic and this he does by poking at the different angles of racial prejudice as they occur in our country and then proceeding to cite examples to support his claim(s). There are four interesting points in the essay (all supported by real-life illustrations) and these are:

(a.) Racial prejudice is practiced, committed benignly and innocently. And because it is done so this way, nobody notices-hence the cycle.
(b.) Ignorance begets bigotry and in the Philippines it happens on a mighty scale.
(c.) Racial prejudice is stroked to feverish heights not only through verbal assaults but also by means of rituals, practices and institutions. (case in point: Beauty contests)
(d.) Whips of discrimination in terms of race are in the hands not only of the elite but also the people of the lowlands who deem themselves higher, better than our ‘natives’.

One of the great marks of this essay is the laser-like focus of its purpose. It is clear that Conrado de Quiros wants his essay to have the resounding echo of a slap. His intention is to criticize, to judge, to condemn in order for us, the readers, to see our own mistakes and change. It maybe harsh, blunt and so ‘in your face’ but the words, the accusations are all real. Don’t we all at one time laughed at someone we deem different and beneath us because they belong to a race so not us; a race darker and ‘less civilized’? The essay hurts-and it is supposed to. This is where Conrado de Quiros succeeds for the moment the tone of reproach reaches the ears of the readers, there arises a feeling of accountability and guilt and whence there is guilt there is also the possibility of change. To emphasize the ‘scolds’, Conrado de Quiros in the end stretches his condemnation to a note of warning: “We keep discriminating against our own kind, we will deserve to be discriminated against. Fools have been known to get a dose of their own medicine.”

Apart from clarity of intention, focus can also be seen in the essay’s effectively narrow range of topic. Conrado de Quiros instead of clumsily scooping from the wide abstract basin of racial prejudice opted to concentrate on the local discrimination of racial minorities in the country. The essay does not aim for something ambitious; it favors the concrete, the manageable, and the relevant. There are gazillion forms of social prejudice (prejudice in terms of race is one) and it’s an excellent decision on the part of Conrado de Quiros to concentrate on only one, the one which is most pressing and ironically enough, the one most neglected in this country. By delimiting the range of topic, the essay opens more room for emphasis and consequently the possibility of change. Through emphasis, the message is sent across in clearer, stronger and more convincing form.

The essay’s strongest mark in terms of content is the logic and strength of Conrado de Quiros’s arguments. His arguments spring from the core of racial prejudice: the act of trivializing discrimination, the ignorance behind it and its incorporation into institutions and mainstream activities. The arguments of Conrado de Quiros are coupled with situations validating his claims whose power and force of conviction rests on their authenticity. There’s just no way to debunk them for these occurrences do happen and sadly enough they do so right under our noses (might they be clogged?) One of my professors just last week remarked about how the Aetas living along the sidewalks of Balintawak are becoming one of the city’s eyesores what with all their big hairs, messy appearance, shoddy clothing and black coffee skin.

Now,couldn’t Conrado de Quiros be any more right,could he?